The Sequesterby Senator Mitch McConnell
Posted on 2013-02-27
McCONNELL. Mr. President, for months now I have been coming to
the floor to urge my colleagues on the other side to help us replace
the President's sequester proposal. Yet here we are, just 2 days to go
until the cuts hit, and the Democrats who control Washington still
haven't put forward a serious bipartisan plan--not the President and
not his allies in Congress. They prefer to keep it alive as a political
issue instead. Now, less than 48 hours before the clock runs out, all
we are offered is a gimmicky tax hike that is designed to fail.
Look, I hope they are not expecting a round of applause for this particular act of political bravery. Is it any wonder the American people are so fed up with Washington? The American people didn't send us here to play games, they sent us here to solve problems. That means getting spending under control and putting the economy back on track.
The American people are clearly tired of the gimmicks. I can't tell you how many letters and e-mails and phone calls I have received about this sequester issue in particular, and the messages my constituents keep sending are simply this: Replacing spending cuts that both parties already agreed to, and to which the President already signed into law, with tax hikes is simply unacceptable.
One Kentuckian from Springfield put it this way: Hold strong and do not give in to more spending . . . Normal folks must adjust their budgets . . . so must the government.
Another constituent said it was important to stand firm in the face of the President's endless campaigning. ``Make him keep his promise of a balanced approach,'' she wrote, and that means one thing: ``Cut spending.'' A woman from Bowling Green urged me to ``hold firm against spending and kicking the can down the road.'' She wants me to hold firm against that--spending and kicking the can down the road. She said: I have had to cut, cut, cut. The least our government should do is seriously make cuts.
And, of course, she is entirely right. It is absurd to think the government cannot get by with a little more than a 2-percent reduction in spending when every working American had to figure out how to make do with 2 percent less in their paychecks just last month.
Some have raised concerns about a proposal that would give agency heads more discretion in prioritizing these cuts. I understand those concerns, but let's be clear about the goal here. The goal isn't to hand over congressional authority, it is to make sure these cuts actually happen and that we don't cut a penny less than we promised the American people we would cut a year and a half ago.
Look, we know most Americans think Washington's spending problem should be addressed by cutting spending. So when the President goes off on a campaign for higher taxes instead of working with Republicans to replace the sequester with smarter cuts, and when Senate Democrats put forward tax hike gimmicks instead of negotiating serious spending-cut solutions, Americans feel as though they are not being listened to.
And they have reason to be upset. They sent a divided government here to Washington, but they expect it to work. The President may not like that fact. He may wish things were different. But he wasn't elected to work with the Congress he wants, he was elected to work with the Congress he has, and that means working with both parties to get things done. It means leaving the gimmicks behind and working with us to hammer out a smarter solution to his sequester.
Republicans have been calling for Democrats to work with us on the sequester over and over. We are still ready to work with them to get something responsible passed, but we can't do it alone. The President's party runs Washington. It is time they got off the campaign trail and started working with us to govern for a change.
Mr. President, I yield the floor.