A picture of Representative Sander M. Levin
Sander L.

About Rep. Sander
  • Preserving the Welfare Work Requirement and Tanf Extension Act of 2013

    by Representative Sander M. Levin

    Posted on 2013-03-13

    submit to reddit

    Read More about Preserving the Welfare Work Requirement and Tanf Extension Act of 2013

    LEVIN. I yield myself such time as I shall consume.

    Bringing up this bill today is doubly unfortunate. Number one, this is a time when we should be coming together--or at least trying to. This is a time when we should not try some partisan efforts. Unfortunately, that's what this is all about. This bill is essentially a pure fabrication of what is true.

    {time} 1550 Last summer the administration came forth with a proposal: states would be allowed to apply for waivers and have some flexibility in terms of the application of the work requirements--not the end of them or changing them, but the implementation of them--provided any project would be required to increase employment by at least 20 percent. So this claim that what is being done here is an effort to put at risk the work requirements is fallacious.

    What happened? After HHS spoke, the Romney campaign decided they might have a campaign issue. So they essentially put together a campaign ad with the fallacious claim that what the Obama administration was trying to do was to weaken welfare reform. The instantaneous reaction of fact checkers was four Pinocchios, pants on fire, complete untruth.

    And this is what Ron Haskins had to say, the Republican person on the staff most involved with the chairman and myself: The idea that the administration is going to try to overturn welfare reform is ridiculous. States have to apply individually for waivers, and they have to explain in detail why the approach would lead to either more employment or better jobs for people who are trying to stay off welfare.

    Indeed, earlier in 2005, 29 Republican Governors wrote asking if they could obtain a waiver in terms of the implementation of the work requirements, and on three occasions the Republicans brought legislation to the floor which would have brought about this kind of a waiver.

    Here's what was said by President Clinton, who worked on welfare reform and signed it in 1996: When some Republican Governors asked if they could have waivers to try new ways to put people on welfare back to work, the Obama administration listened.

    And I insert at this point that there was a request from the Republican Governor of Utah.

    I continue with the quote: Because we all know it is hard for even people with good work histories to get jobs today. So moving folks from welfare to work is a real challenge, and the administration agreed to give waivers to those Governors and others only if they had a credible plan to increase employment by 20 percent, and they could keep the waivers only if they did increase employment. Now, did I make myself clear? The requirement was for more work, not less.

    So this was tried last year. There was an effort by the Republicans. They came forth with a bill. The campaign was full blast. And what they wanted to do was to reaffirm or to support a political ad by their candidate for President. That's what that was all about.

    We had a vote along partisan lines. And as we said, it went nowhere in the Senate. By the way, I don't think it helped their Presidential candidate as it was so blatantly false, so patently political.

    The election is over. The people have spoken. The President has been reelected. Why bring up this political horse? It's worse than lame; it's mistaken.

    With that, I reserve the balance of my time.

    [[Page H1375]] Mr. CAMP. I would just say, Mr. Speaker, for 5 seconds that in the Statement of Administration Policy we got yesterday, they say that no States formally applied for State waivers.

    I yield 3 minutes to the distinguished chairman of the Human Resources Subcommittee, the gentleman from Washington (Mr. Reichert).

  • submit to reddit
  • Register your constituent account to respond

    Constituent Register