National Defense Authorization Actby Former Senator Mark Udall
Posted on 2013-12-20
UDALL of Colorado. Madam President, I rise today to welcome the
final passage of the 2014 National Defense Authorization Act--
frequently referred to as the NDAA. I would like to thank Armed
Services Committee Chairman Levin and Ranking Member Inhofe, as well as
Chairman McKeon and Ranking Member Smith in the House of
Representatives, for their tireless and collaborative efforts in
securing this critical piece of legislation. Although the NDAA did not
go through the optimal amendment process, its passage today extends the
necessary authorities to implement our national security strategy and
support and protect Colorado's military community. As we head into the
second session of the 113th Congress, I hope that we will remain
mindful of the importance of a full and robust debate and ensure that
the 2015 NDAA is open to amendments on the floor of the Senate.
As the chairman of the Strategic Forces Subcommittee, I also want to thank my friend and colleague on the committee, Ranking Member Sessions. Senator Sessions has a long tenure on the subcommittee, and I have benefited from his experience. I am grateful for the collegiality he has shown over the past year, and I look forward to starting our work together again in the next session.
I would also like to recognize the staff of the subcommittee for their tremendous support and dedication. For Senator Sessions and his subcommittee staff, I want to thank Dr. Robert Soofer, who advises on nuclear and missile defense matters, and Daniel Lerner, who advises on space, intelligence and cyber security. I also want to thank both Pete Landrum, Senator Sessions' senior defense policy adviser and Casey Howard, my military legislative assistant. On my subcommittee staff, Jonathan Epstein, deserves great credit for his work on nuclear weapons, space, and a host of other issues. Richard Fieldhouse, who advises on missile defense, and Kirk McConnell, who assists me on cyber and intelligence, also have my thanks and respect. Finally, special thanks to Lauren Gillis, the subcommittee's staff assistant, for her countless hours of preparation for our hearings, working with witnesses, and organizing our subcommittee markup.
In closing, I would like to highlight one provision of the 2014 NDAA, section 3112, which establishes an Office of Cost Analysis and Program Evaluation in the National Nuclear Security Administration, NNSA. I want to be clear that the establishment of this new office was not meant to in any way alter the responsibilities and oversight of the Naval Reactors Program--a division of the NNSA that has a long track record of producing high quality projects on time and within budget. The Naval Reactors Program has traditionally been semi-independent within the NNSA, being dual hatted with fleet activities of the Navy, whose overall responsibilities are found and carried out under Executive Order No. 12344. While section 3112 speaks to the NNSA as a whole, it was not our intent to include the Naval Reactors Program under the purview of the new Office of Cost Analysis and Program Evaluation. During the next session, I will work with my colleagues in both the House and the Senate to correct this provision and reflect that intent.