Keystone XL Pipeline Actby Representative Steve Russell
Posted on 2015-01-09
RUSSELL. Mr. Speaker, as a combat veteran, we should never have
to fight for something that we can so readily produce here. Why should
we put competitors in leverage over our economy and give them dollars
to use against us?
We hear a lot of talk from progressives on the environment, Mr.
Speaker. Imagine a life without petroleum, no cell phones, no asphalt
for roads, no synthetic clothing, no plastics. On what do progressives
suppose we run our magnificent Nation and lifestyle? Perhaps their
answer is sweet bubble love and rainbow stew.
Mr. PALLONE. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
Mr. Speaker, the Keystone XL pipeline moves us in exactly the wrong direction: enabling production of the dirtiest crude oil on the planet to expand and increasing our carbon pollution for decades to come.
We still have a lot of work to do to cut our carbon pollution and avoid catastrophic carbon change. The concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere just hit 400 parts per million for the first time in human history.
Although this administration is making great progress, we are far from achieving our pollution reduction goals, and the need to act is more urgent than ever. I would urge my colleagues to vote ``no.'' The President is going to veto this legislation. It is just a political exercise at this point.
Again, it bothers me that I hear so much from the other side about trying to help this Canadian company. We should be concerned about the United States. We should be concerned about the world and the environment that results from climate change and the continued production of greenhouse gases.
My concern and the concern of the President is that this is simply not legislation that has been proven to be, so [[Page H178]] far, in the national interest. The President is just asking for more time to make that determination.
Vote ``no,'' and I yield back the balance of my time.