Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2015by Representative Rosa L. DeLauro
Posted on 2015-01-13
DeLAURO. Madam Chair, with this bill, the majority plays a
dangerous game with our national security. We all know why they are
doing this. They want to tie the President's hands on immigration
because they do not agree with him there. But by acting this way, the
majority has torn up what should be a fundamental rule of American
politics: that we do not play politics with the security of our Nation.
The fact that the majority chooses to gamble with Homeland Security, of all budgets, is troubling, to say the least. At a time when we face a higher terrorist threat, these tactics are potentially deadly.
Let us recall that the Department of Homeland Security was born out of the searing attacks on this Nation on September 11, 2001. We created it to protect our country against further atrocities. Three thousand people died. We have seen what our enemies are capable of. We saw it in the Boston Marathon bombing last year. We saw it again over the past week in a shocking series of terrorist murders in Paris.
Funding for national security programs should be sacrosanct. Republicans and Democrats could so easily have come together to pass a full-year funding bill. Instead, the majority chooses tactics that put the security of American families at risk.
They have allowed three nongermane amendments. The American people know about this nongermaneness. They have added that to this bill. That seeks only to make life harder for immigrant families. I remember in 2007 when Chairman Rogers, the chair of the Appropriations Committee, said on this floor: There is no more important chore that the Congress has . . . than to protect the country as best we can from its enemies and from natural disasters. That is what this bill is all about.
Well, his party should take his advice now.
These games are dangerous. They are disgraceful. They are wrong. I will vote against this bill, and I urge my colleagues to do the same.